It
seems to me that Friere’s whole concept seems to focus on the fact that
our system of education has devolved to a mass produced education
churning out “learned” people like a factory. Many identical products at
a low cost. What is lost in this though is the individuality that makes
any particular item unique and possibly more valuable. Going back to
people though, what is lost is the ability to reason or argue (non
combative) through a discussion. What I got from the paper that open
discussion is one of the things that should be brought back to our
education system. Open dialogue between the students and the teachers
rather than a unidirectional communication where the teacher is the only
one speaking. This is one of the things that I really like the idea of
as these kinds of discussions are the ones that I think encourages
learning and retention. In my experience nothing sticks better than the
experience of voicing a disagreement to an idea and having the point
defended well. It also allows for someone to present what could be a
general misunderstanding that the teacher is able to clear up. Something
that may not have been otherwise presented and as a result accidently
ignored.
No comments:
Post a Comment